Malec v Hutton

From Uni Study Guides
Jump to: navigation, search

Citation: Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638

This information can be found in the Textbook: Sappideen, Vines, Grant & Watson, Torts: Commentary and Materials (Lawbook Co, 10th ed, 2009), pp. 554-7 [14.130] or here

Contents

Background facts

  • The Plaintiff [Malec] was an employee of the Defendant's [Hutton].
  • He contracted a disease called brucellosis.
  • That disease can also lead to depression and back problems, which he did end up developing.
  • As a result, he could not work anymore
  • However, the court found that there was a 60% chance of the back problems/depression happening anyways, without the disease.

Legal issues

Judgment

  • Past losses, which have happened already, are a matter of fact and therefore the court decides them on a balance of probabilities - this means if there's over 50% chance that it happened because of the injury, then the plaintiff can recover for it.
  • However, future things are decided in this 'all or nothing' method.
  • Rather, damages for future losses are awarded according to the probability - if there was a probability of 40% that the future loss will be sustained as a result of the injury, than the plaintiff will be able to recover 40% of the damage.
    • "Thus, the court assesses the degree of probability that an event would have occurred, or might occur, and adjusts its award of damages to reflect the degree of probability."

References

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox